
RAAAAAAAANDY - "AAAAAAAANGY"
Limp Bizkit guitarist Wes Borland says this about the new album - "It's definitely a fun party kinda vibe, it's a little like the old stuff but with a Daft Punk vibe thrown in."
1. This is awesome, because 10 years ago I always said "If Limp Bizkit sounded a little bit more like Daft Punk they could rival The Beatles".
2. Sounds like DJ Lethal has been listening to "Stronger" by Kanye West too much.
3. At least they realized it was time to stop stealing Korn's mojo.
A comparison of the White Blood Cells single and the Air Force Reserve commercial reveals that the music is nearly exactly the same, with Jack White’s guitar riffs firmly intact and another guitar replicating the cadence of the original vocal medley. The commercial initially seems like an X Games ad until three fighter jets fly into frame during its final seconds. The “Grab Some Air” recruitment spot “features the high-octane thrills of action sports at its best. This is sure to capture the interest of even the most enthusiastic sports fan,” the Air Force Reserve site writes while listing two-dozen television markets where the ad will air. The Air Force Reserve makes no mention of the White Stripes.
“The White Stripes takes strong insult and objection to the Air Force Reserves presenting this advertisement with the implication that we licensed one of our songs to encourage recruitment during a war we do not support,” the Stripes write. “The White Stripes support this nation’s military, at home and during times when our country needs and depends on them. We simply don’t want to be a cog in the wheel of the current conflict, and hope for a safe and speedy return home for our troops.”
Online opinions seem very split between Sarah Palin's "Hardworking American People" and those with an actual education behind them to form a learned opinion. Those who choose not to read into the entire issue see this as a White Stripes vs. Troops/Military/America, when in fact we are talking about a copyright case. The U.S. Government and major publication companies are on a warpath of their own to enforce selective copyright rights against consumers and artists while breaking those same laws themselves. In this situation, our government paid someone to rip off a band without giving them credit, payment, or choice.
The people who watch it today (mainly 12 to 16 year old girls), don’t refer to MTV as music television. They don’t have the same emotional connection that the people who previously grew up with the channel do. The only people who have been challenging MTV to play more music videos are the one's who remember the good ol' days of past. The channel has official evolved into something different. 12-16 year old girls LOVE MTV and probably have no idea why the name is MTV in the first place. From this demographic perspective, what's the point in watching a channel in hopes of seeing your favorite artists' music video, when you could spend 10 seconds online pulling it up whenever you want. There will ALWAYS be new 12 year olds in this world, and they will ALWAYS want something different than the last. MTV is simply capitalizing on future business by removing "music television".
Although it's easy to see their reason for changing the logo, I vow to remain one of the critics who will continue to chastise the network for it's lack of music. Call me old fashioned, but as Justin "He's So Dreamy, The Only Man I Would Go Gay For" Timberlake put it, we don't want to see the Simpsons on reality television.
The network will likely continue to schedule their Video Music Awards and provide ancillary between-commercial coverage to musical figures. But as we recently saw with the Grammys, they're officially the new VMA's.